The Role of Soft Power in US Foreign Policy:

The role of soft power in US foreign policy has been the subject of many debates over the years. Some have asserted that this is the source of America's success in international affairs, while others have argued that soft power is a limitation. This article will explore both sides of the argument, examining the views of China and Russia.

China's view of US foreign policy:

A recent Pew Research Center survey found that most Americans view China as a competitor, not a partner. They also say that the relationship is strained and that the country's human rights policies are a severe problem. However, their perceptions of China's views of US foreign policy are divided.

The survey, conducted by the nationally representative American Trends Panel, showed that most Americans see China as a rival or an enemy. Among Republicans, more than two-thirds of those surveyed consider it an enemy. Among Democrats, the percentage of those who describe it as an enemy is lower. It also shows that Republicans are more concerned about China-related issues than Democrats.

According to the report, most Americans agree that the United States should limit China's power and get more challenging with it. More than half of adults, including many younger people, say China's human rights policy is a severe problem.

Russia's view of US foreign policy:

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned of the dangers of further eastern expansion. He has also intervened in friendly countries, including Kazakhstan, Belarus and Georgia. Unsurprisingly, Russia's relationship with the West remains strained at best.

In many ways, Putin's foreign policy has re-established Russia as a great power competitor. He has taken advantage of missed opportunities, opportunistic behaviour and missteps by the United States.

The Kremlin's brand of authoritarian politics appeals to traditional values, order and security. Russian operators use propaganda campaigns to inject false narratives into the global informational environment, rolling back American influence.

The Kremlin has leveraged its vast territory on the Eurasian continent, immense energy resources, and relatively low-cost power projection capabilities. This allows it to engage in global activism. But it is still being determined if the results have benefited Russia or its partners.

Three factors continue to drive contemporary policymakers' attitudes towards Moscow. Understanding them can provide insight into President Joe Biden's administration and other essential players in the foreign policy space.

US culture retains great sources of resilience:

Culture plays a crucial role in the plethora of factors associated with resilience. Its importance has been questioned. However, there needs to be more research on the cultural dimensions of resilience. The present study examined data from 15 countries.

First, the study examined the relationship between quality of life and resilience. QoL was associated with strong resilience. Emotional and spiritual qualities were also found to be associated with resilience. Resilience is an essential component of life, as it protects against traumatic events.

The culture was a significant covariate in the model, which accounted for about 12% of the total variance. Cultural factors had a positive effect on the strength of the relationship between QoL and resilience.

Specifically, the study found a statistically significant association between positive feelings and resilience. Positive emotions accounted for 8.8% of the variance.

There was a significant correlation between the strength of the association and age. Older people showed a stronger relationship between QoL and resilience than younger adults.

Limiting line of soft power:

Soft power is the ability of a country to influence international processes. It is based on principles of appeal, sympathy, and voluntary participation. The United States has used soft power in public diplomacy since the late 1940s.

Soft power has become increasingly important in the last ten years. International polls have begun to list countries according to their soft power. These polls have had real-world consequences. They have shaped the meaning of soft power, despite their limitations.

There are two major types of soft power. One is economic power. The other is cultural power. Economic power can be measured by weapons such as missiles, tanks, and troops. However, soft power's economic and artistic types sometimes overlap.

The Chinese Communist Party has clung to the belief that government is the primary source of soft power. While this is true in some instances, China cannot achieve parity with its democratic counterparts.

Author Bio:

Carmen Troy is a research-based content writer for Essays. Uk, Dissertation help services. They provide Best dissertation writing service, Dissertation proposal writing Help and many more services to students of all levels, and their experts are all UK-qualified.  Mr Carmen holds a PhD degree in mass communication. He loves to express his views on various issues, including education, technology, and more.